Aw, jeez, after TWO YEARS of campaigning, I thought we’d have some kind of clear-cut choice in this year’s presidential election, but that’s proving to be a pipe dream on both sides. Take Obaba for example: he’s long been considered the most liberal senator in office – so how does that square with these observations?
- Once upon a time, in his hometown of Chicago, he said he favored a ban on handguns, but after the recent Supreme Court ruling striking down Washington DC’s ban, he said he’s okay with that.
- What true Democrat (or, as my dearly-departed former father-in-law Ed Leers would refer to them, “Democraps”) would be in favor of the death penalty, especially for a crime that did not result in loss of life? Obama said that the Supreme Court was wrong in overrulling the death penalty for child rape convictions.
- Could a Democrat possibly be in favor of the erosion of our personal right to privacy? He seems to be, judging from his voting in favor of FISA, which grants immunity to telecoms for cooperating in warrantless wiretaps.
- How could a card-carrying Democrat be in favor of shifting good jobs outside the border? He said that NAFTA was ‘devastating’ and a ‘big mistake’, but now he’s against renegotiation of the treaty.
- There is NO WAY that a Democrat would be in favor of tax cuts for corporate fat cats – uh, guess again.
- I’ve already mentioned his flip-flop on public financing of his campaign – can I get some maple syrup for this waffle?
Barack Obama was a dyed-in-the-wool liberal all the way through the primary campaign season. Now, as every politician does for the presidential contest (including McCain), he’s drifting toward the center; he knows that’s the only way to win the office. Has he truly changed his mind on these issues, or can these attitude adjustments be chalked up purely to political expediency?
And who will he be if he wins the White House?
Thoughts? Please comment.
I DON’T HAVE TO
MY MIND AGAIN!